Cornell Law Review Volume 103 Issue 4
Article

Divide & Concur: Separate Opinions & Legal Change

To the extent concurring opinions elicit commentary at all, it is largely contempt. They are condemned for muddying the clarity of the law, fracturing the court, and diminishing the authoritative voice of the majority. But what if this neglect, or even disdain, of concurring opinions is off the mark? In this article, we argue for […]

Read More :: View PDF

Lawyers’ Abuse of Technology

The Article is a thorough analysis of how the current scheme for regulating lawyers has failed to adapt to technology and why that failure is disastrous. It discusses (1) why technology, electronic communications, and social media require specialized attention in lawyer regulation, (2) what mechanisms can be harnessed to meet this need, and (3) the […]

Read More :: View PDF

The Maternal Dilemma

This article questions the sufficiency of contemporary parental policies in undermining the gendered division of care-work at home. It reveals that despite the optimistic expectations that accompanied the enactment of gender-neutral leave legislation such as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the provision of equal care opportunities for men, a marked gap separates […]

Read More :: View PDF
Note

“Making America Safe Again”: The Proper Interpretation of § 1101(A)(43)(S) of the Immigration and Nationality Act from Both a Chevron and a Public Policy Perspective

To read the complete note, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

Benefit Corporations: A Proposal for Assessing Liability in Benefit Enforcement Proceedings

To read the complete note, click “VIEW PDF” below.  

Read More :: View PDF