Cornell Law School Logo - white on transparent background

Current Print Edition

Arousal by Algorithm

Amy Adler

Emily Kempin Professor of Law, NYU School of Law. 

The problem of Big Tech has consumed recent legal scholarship and popular discourse. We are reckoning daily with the threats that digital speech platforms like Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), TikTok, and YouTube pose to our personal and political lives. Yet while this conversation is raging in discussions about the impact of technology on…

Article II and the Federal Reserve

Aditya Bamzai & Aaron L. Nielson

Martha Lubin Karsh and Bruce A. Karsh Bicentennial Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law, Professor of Law, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University. 

The Supreme Court has twice held since 2020 that statutory restrictions on the President’s removal power violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Because such removal restrictions create a measure of policy independence from the President, these cases have prompted discussion about the future of independent agencies generally, with special attention to the Federal Reserve…

Antitrust for Immigrants

Gregory Day

Associate Professor, University of Georgia Terry College of Business; Courtesy Appointment University of Georgia School of Law; Affliated Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project. 

Immigrants and undocumented people have often encountered discrimination because they compete against “native” businesses and workers, resulting in protests, boycotts, and even violence intended to exclude immigrants from markets. Key to this story is government’s ability to discriminate as well: it is indeed common for state and federal actors to enact protectionist laws and regulations…

How the Mitigation Doctrine Produces Protections Against Workplace Discrimination

Richard A Gagliardi, III

J.D. Candidate, Cornell Law School, 2024; Ph.D. in Politics, Princeton University, 2021; A.B. in Economics and Political Science, Brown University, 2015; Online Editor, Cornell Law Review Vol. 109. 

Employment discrimination weakens the American economy, contributes to inequality, and deprives individuals of career opportunities. Estimates place the annual cost of employment discrimination at over sixty-four billion dollars. Economic research further documents earnings differentials of more than thirty percent between members of different racial groups or genders. To combat employment discrimination, Congress enacted a series…

Neurosearches

Josh A. Roth

J.D. Candidate, Cornell Law School, 2024; Articles Editor, Cornell Law Review Vol. 109.

Neurotechnology is advancing exponentially, and the laws of data privacy and security cannot keep pace. Soon, governments will exploit this technology in criminal investigations with what this Note calls “neurosearches.” Scholars have argued against the compelled gathering of neurological evidence as a violation of the Fifth Amendment, likening it to testimony and thus barred as…

Current Online Edition

New Vision, Old Model: How the FTC Exaggerated Harms When Rejecting Business Justifications for Noncompetes

Alan J. Meese

Ball Professor of Law and Director, Center for the Study of Law & Markets, William & Mary Law School.  

The Federal Trade Commission has rejected consumer welfare and the Rule of Reason—standards that drove antitrust for 50 years—in favor of a “NeoBrandeisian” vision. This approach seeks to enhance democracy by condemning abuses of corporate power that restrict the autonomy of employees and consumers, regardless of impact on prices or wages. Pursuing this agenda, the…

A Common Law for the Age of Amici: How the Party-Presentation Principle Can Help Identify Binding Precedent

David S. Coale

Partner, Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, LLP, Dallas, Texas.  

Two recent Supreme Court cases suggest an additional dimension for the traditional test that distinguishes dicta from holding.  In the first, United States v. Sineneng-Smith, the Ninth Circuit reversed a criminal conviction based on arguments made by amici appointed by that court. The Supreme Court then reversed 9-0, holding that the Ninth Circuit’s handling of…