Cornell Law Review Volume 103 Issue 3

The Rights of Marriage: Obergefell, Din, and the Future of Constitutional Family Law

In the summer of 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down two groundbreaking constitutional family law decisions. One decision became famous overnight: Obergefell v. Hodges declared that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. The other, Kerry v. Din, went largely overlooked. That later case concerned not the right to marry but the […]

Read More :: View PDF

International Cybertorts: Expanding State Accountability in Cyberspace

States are not being held accountable for the vast majority of their harmful cyberoperations, largely because classifications created in physical space do not map well onto the cyber domain. Most injurious and invasive cyberoperations are not cybercrimes and do not constitute cyberwarfare, nor are states extending existing definitions of wrongful acts permitting countermeasures to cyberoperations […]

Read More :: View PDF

The Central Claiming Renaissance

The Supreme Court has recently reinvigorated the law of patentable subject matter. But beneath the headlines proclaiming the return of limits to patent eligibility, a more profound shift has taken place: central claiming is reborn. The Court’s eligibility cases are significant outliers compared to today’s run-of-the-mill patent law because claim language plays little role in […]

Read More :: View PDF

Using Daubert to Evaluate Evidence-Based Sentencing

To read the complete note, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

The Partiality Norm: Systematic Deference in the Office of Legal Counsel

To read the complete note, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF