Cornell Law Review Online The Online Presence of Cornell Law Review

Originalism as Faith

Read More :: View PDF

Collection Anxiety

DNA is not the only path to exoneration. Some of the wrongfully accused exculpate themselves using video recordings, transaction records, and other digital information. Given the gluttonous data collection practices of our government, these exoneration stories should be much more frequent than they are. Digital Innocence by Joshua A.T. Fairfield and Erik Luna puts forward […]

Read More :: View PDF

Big Data and Due Process

Today, electronic footprints may follow us wherever we go. Electronic traces, left through a smartphone or other device, can be tracked to the scene of a crime, or they can place a person far from a crime scene. Those traces can sometimes be tracked far more reliably than the types of trace evidence traditionally examined […]

Read More :: View PDF

The Open Society and Its Digital Enemies: A Reply to Professors Bambauer and Garrett

Don’t let our title fool you. Jane Bambauer and Brandon Garrett are friends of an open society, not its enemies. In distinct and distinctly important ways, they have engaged and expounded upon our concept of digital innocence, and in so doing, they have emboldened us to find the courage of our convictions and indeed to […]

Read More :: View PDF

Singapore’s Constitutionalism: A Model, But of What Sort?

To read the complete Response, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual: An Opportunity to Correct the Problems of ERISA Preemption

To read the complete Essay, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

Human Trafficking and Film: How Popular Portrayals Influence Law and Public Perception

To read the complete Essay, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

Assumed Sane

To read the complete Essay, click “VIEW PDF” below.

Read More :: View PDF

A Sustainable Music Industry For the 21st Century

Read More :: View PDF

Two Economic Rationales for Felony Murder

Critics of the felony-murder rule have long argued that the rule is outdated and unreasonable, and the Supreme Court since 1982 has interpreted the Eighth Amendment to limit use of the death penalty in felony-murder cases. I present here two economic rationales for the felony-murder rule and show how the Court’s interpretation of the Eighth […]

Read More :: View PDF