Cornell Law Review Online The Online Presence of Cornell Law Review

What Juries Really Think: Practical Guidance for Trial Lawyers

What do juries really think about lawyers? What makes jurors tick? What do lawyers do that irritates jurors? What can lawyers do better in the courtroom from the jury’s perspective? These are the questions at the heart of this article, which provides useful insight gleaned from more than 500 jurors who served in federal district court […]

Read More :: View PDF

The Curious Case of Wellbutrin: How the Third Circuit Mistook Itself for the Supreme Court

FTC v. Actavis was one of the most important antitrust cases of the modern era. In one fell swoop, the Supreme Court ensconced antitrust’s role in analyzing settlements by which brand firms pay generics to delay entering the market. The Court underscored the harms presented by large and unjustified payments and rejected some of the […]

Read More :: View PDF

Are Anti-Bullying Laws Effective?

Since 2010, when several high-profile bullying-related suicides brought bullying and cyberharassment into the national consciousness, all fifty states have passed laws that address bullying among the nation’s youth.  This Essay is the first in a series of three projects on federal, state, municipal, and individual school approaches to bullying.  There are only four published studies […]

Read More :: View PDF